<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gay Persuasion &#187; civil law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gaypersuasion.com/tag/civil-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gaypersuasion.com</link>
	<description>No Longer Hiding In The Closet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 16:51:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Australia&#8217;s Compromise</title>
		<link>http://gaypersuasion.com/2009/08/faith-and-gays/559/australias-compromise/</link>
		<comments>http://gaypersuasion.com/2009/08/faith-and-gays/559/australias-compromise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 19:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Disgruntled</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zealots]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gaypersuasion.com/?p=559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is it about some, who think that only their rights are important? Doesn't it stand to reason that your rights are dependent on me having the same rights? Yet when it comes to same sex marriage, that doesn't happen to be the case. Instead of supporting the rights of all people, to enjoy civil benefits, many rant, rave, and holler, that it is somehow going to diminish their own rights. The exact opposite is true, but that somehow, doesn't seem to matter to these religious zealots, who really, are just trying to impose their own views, on everyone else.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gaypersuasion.com/2009/08/faith-and-gays/559/australias-compromise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Religious Freedom</title>
		<link>http://gaypersuasion.com/2009/04/faith-and-gays/550/religious-freedom/</link>
		<comments>http://gaypersuasion.com/2009/04/faith-and-gays/550/religious-freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 21:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fed Up</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court rulings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free will]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minority rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious freedoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gaypersuasion.com/?p=550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Iowa court ruling is not about Gay Rights, but is about insuring the rights of everyone, to believe, to worship, as they wish. It is more about insuring that churches like the Mormons, like the Catholics, can oppose homosexuality, as being a sin, within their own Church. It says one can believe as they wish, without being denied the same civil benefits, that others enjoy. It is in fact, protecting the very rights, of those who claim it doesn't. The ruling is a victory, for religious freedom, not just that gays can marry.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://gaypersuasion.com/2009/04/faith-and-gays/550/religious-freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

